Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinances - ORD-03-1150 - 05/05/2003 - GRANT CUP 3402 W ELM ST SARFATTYORDINANCE NO. ORD-03-1150 AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A DRIVE-THRU AND OUTDOOR SEATING AND A PARKING VARIANCE FOR A NEW DUNKIN DONUNTS/BASKIN ROBBINS RESTAURANT AT 4502 W. ELM STREET IN THE CITY OF MCHENRY, MCHENRY COUNTY, ILLINOIS WHEREAS, a petition has been filed with the City by George Sarfatty requesting a Conditional Use Permit for a drive-thru and outdoor seating and a Variance from the parking requirements to permit a reduction of eleven (11) parking spaces in order to construct a new Dunkin Donuts/Baskin Robbins restaurant at 4502 W. Elm Street, legally described on "Exhibit A", attached hereto and incorporated herein, (the "SUBJECT PROPERTY"); and WHEREAS, a public hearing on said petition was held before the Planning and Zoning Commission on April 3, 2003, in the manner prescribed by ordinance and statute, and as a result of said hearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission did recommend to the City Council the granting of the requested Conditional Use Permit and Variance; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the evidence and recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission and finds that the approval of the requested Conditional Use Permit and Variance are consistent with the objectives of the City of McHenry Zoning Ordinance to protect the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of its residents. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MCHENRY, MCHENRY COUNTY, ILLINOIS, AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the SUBJECT PROEPRTY is hereby granted a Conditional Use Permit for a drive-thru and outdoor seating in order to construct a new Dunkin Donuts/Baskin Robbins restaurant subject to the condition that the SUBJECT PROPERTY be designed in substantial conformance, subject to engineering approval, with the plans submitted by Sarfatty Associates, Ltd. including: the site plan, landscape plan which includes the light pole and railing detail, photometric plan and the monument sign detail, all prepared by Sarfatty Associates, Ltd. dated 3/6/03 and bearing a latest revision date of 4/11/03 consisting of a total of four (4) sheets and the lighting fixture specifications prepared by USArchitectural Lighting consisting of two (2) sheets, collectively, (the "SITE PLAN"). SECTION 2: In granting said Conditional Use Permit, the City Council finds that the requirements of Table 31 of the Zoning Ordinance have been met in that: 1. Any adverse impact of types or volumes of traffic flow not otherwise typical in the zoning district has been minimized. 2. Any adverse effects of noise, glare, odor, dust, waste disposal, blockage of light or air, or other adverse environmental effects of a type or degree not characteristic of permitted uses in the zoning district, have been appropriately controlled; 3. The proposed use will fit harmoniously with the existing natural or man-made character of its surroundings, and with permitted uses in the zoning district. The use will not have undue deleterious effect on the environmental quality, property values, or neighborhood character already existing in the area or normally associated with permitted uses in the district. 4. The proposed use will not require existing community facilities or services to a degree disproportionate to that normally expected of permitted uses in the district, nor generate disproportionate demand for new services or facilities, in such a way as to place undue burdens upon existing development in the area; 5. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the safety or health of the employees, patrons, or visitors associated with the use nor of the general public in the vicinity; and 6. The proposed use is in harmony with all other elements of compatibility pertinent to the Conditional Use and its particular location. SECTION 3: That the SUBJECT PROPERTY is hereby granted a Variance to Table 13 of the Zoning Ordinance to allow a reduction in the number of parking spaces required. SECTION 4: In granting said Variance, the City Council finds that the requirements of Table 32 of the Zoning Ordinance have been met in that: 1. Special circumstances exist that are peculiar to the property for which the variance is sought and that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zoning district. And these circumstances are not of so general or recurrent a nature as to make it reasonably practical to provide a general regulation to cover them. 2. The special circumstances referenced herein relate only to the physical character of the land or building(s) for which the variance is sought, such as dimension, topography, or soil conditions. They do not concern any business or activity the present or prospective owner or tenant carries on, or seeks to carry on, therein, not to the personal, business, or financial circumstances of such owner or tenant or any other party with interest in the property. 3. The special circumstances that are the basis for the variance have not resulted from any act of the applicant or of any other party with interest in the property. 4. The strict application of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would result in unnecessary and undue hardship upon the applicant, as distinguished from a mere inconvenience. 5. A Variance is necessary for the applicant to preserve and enjoy a substantial property right possessed by other properties in the same zoning district and does not confer a special privilege ordinarily denied to other properties in the district. 6. The granting of a Variance is necessary not because it will increase the applicant's economic return, although it may have this effect, but because without the variance the applicant will be deprived of any reasonable use or enjoyment of the property. 7. The granting of a Variance will not alter the essential character of the locality nor substantially impair environmental quality, property values, or public safety or welfare in the vicinity. 8. The granting of a Variance will be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of 01A the Zoning Ordinance and of the Comprehensive Plan of the City, as viewed in light of any changed conditions since their adoption. 9. The Variance requested is the minimum required to provide the applicant with reasonable use and enjoyment of the property. - SECTION 5: All Ordinances or parts thereof in conflict with the terms and provisions hereof are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict. SECTION 6: This Ordinance shall be published in pamphlet form by and under the authority of the corporate authorities of the City of McHenry, McHenry County, Illinois. SECTION 7: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval, and publication in pamphlet form as provided by law. PASSED THIS 5TH DAY OF MAY , 2003 AYES: BOLGER, GLAB, LOW, MURGATROYD, WIMMER, PETERSON, CONDON NAYS: NONE ABSTAINED: NONE NONE ABSENT: NONE NOT VOTING: 5TH MAY APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 2003 ATTEST: 1 C CIT CLE K 0 & MM, I A, I 00M, I rn 3 Exhibit "A" Legal Description of the SUBJECT PROPERTY PARCEL is LOT "A" DUNKIN CERWIN'S SUBDIVISION AND THE LOT 18 IN BLOCK 1 IN LAKELAND 45 NORTH, RANGE 8 EAST OF THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED DECEMBER COUNTY, ILLINOIS. DO EA PARCEL 2; LOT 18 IN BLOCK 1- WESTERLY 18 FEET OF SAID LOT SEI BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF SE OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN,•. NOVEMBER 21, 1957 AS DOCUMENT 3; AMENDED BY CERTIFICATE RECORDED: Mr —HENRY COUNTY, ILLINOIS. 'S RESUBOIVISION OF LOT. 1 IN ROBERT RLY 8 FEET OF THE WESTERLY IS FEET OF -S UNIT 2, ALL IN SECTION 27. TOWNSHIP ) PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE 977 AS DOCUMENT NO. 717024. IN McHENRY LAKELAND SHORES UNIT 2 (EXCEPT THE PART OF DUNKIN DONUTS RESUBDIVISION) :ON 27, TOWNSHIP 45 NORTH, RANGE 8 EAST CCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED '53, IN BOOK. 13 OF PLATS, PAGE 46, AS kY 25. 1981 AS DOCUMENT NO. 386168 IN 2