Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - 10/21/1998 - Committee of the Whole COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING OCTOBER 21, 1998 A Committee of the Whole Meeting of the McHenry City Council was called to order by Mayor Cuda at 9:14 P.M. on Wednesday, October 21, 1998 in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Center. At roll call the following Aldermen were present: Bolger, Glab, Murgatroyd, Baird. Absent: McClatchey. City Staff in attendance were: City Administrator Lobaito, Deputy Clerk Kunzer, City Attorney McArdle, Chief of Police Joyce, Director of Public Works Batt, Director of Parks and Recreation Merkel, Director of Community Development Napolitano. Absent: City Clerk Althoff. DIEDRICH FARM/GERSTAD PROPERTY ANNEXATION In attendance were Mr. Donald Gerstad and Mr. Roger Gerstad of Gerstad Builders Inc. Ms. Ginger Geiser, Court Reporter, was present. Mayor Cuda stated the purpose of this evening's meeting is to provide a forum for Council to carefully go over, paragraph by paragraph, the proposed Annexation Agreement for the Diedrich Farm/Gerstad Property, in an effort to clarify the points of the Agreement. Mayor Cuda announced there would be no opportunity for Public Input as this is a workshop meeting of the McHenry City Council. He noted City Administrator Lobaito presented Council with a concise summary of highlights of the Agreement in the attached Agenda Supplement. Attorney McArdle explained and/or clarified the following points: · Paragraph 1, Provides for the annexation of the subject property; · Paragraph 2, Provides for RS-2 zoning upon annexation to the City; · Paragraph 3(1), Indicates a detention pond will be installed pursuant to the Engineering requirements and noted there will be two or more detention ponds · Paragraph 3(2), Allows for two recreational tot lots. However, if school district 156 obtains part of the subject property, only one lot will be dedicated to City; · Paragraph 3(5), Provides that landscaping on the perimeter of the subject property, particularly on Lots 8 through 15, shall be at least 50% opacity; · Paragraph 3(6), Provides for a maximum density of 280 units on 118 acres with a 2.37 ratio of units/acre. A lengthy discussion followed. Mr. Donald Gerstad indicated this reduction in density would not be acceptable to the applicants. · Section IV, the Public Improvement Reimbursement clause, Provides for the inclusion of the benefitted property in any recapture agreement. Discussion followed regarding the interest rate of 9%. Clarification shall be made as to whether this is simple interest or compounded annually. The maximum duration of any recapture agreement shall be 10 years. · Paragraphs IVA(3-7) are boiler plate language regarding the recapture agreement. · Paragraph IVA(8), Provides for the exemption of the Adams Property from recapture agreement. Mr. Adams is providing the site for the water tower and he is running the main to the site. · Paragraph IVB and IVC are boiler plate language pertaining to the recapture agreement. · Section V, Sewer and Water. Attorney McArdle explained at the time of annexation, the City would have to be in possession of recorded easements which would bring the water to the west property line from the west side of the river. He stated there is no obligation for the developer to extend the water to the east property line. This would be in the developer's time frame, at their pace, and not the City's. General discussion occurred regarding the possibility of School District 156 securing a portion of the subject property, either by purchase or condemnation. Council noted, in the event the School District would need to bring water to their site prior to Gerstad bringing the lines east, the School District would then be the entity which would be recapturing the cost to bring the water main east. Council directed City Attorney McArdle to draft language to provide for this possibility. Returning to the review of the Annexation Agreement: October 21, 1998, Page 2 Committee of the Whole · Paragraph VC, Provides that the developer will not have to bring the water main to the tower, only to the Adams property line. · Paragraph VI, Provides that $350,000 will be paid by the developer toward the City's construction of the water tower. These monies will be credited toward the City's Capital Development Fees and Permit Fees. However, credit will not be given toward Meter Fees. Mr. Donald Gerstad indicated if School District 156 is successful in their condemnation suit, it could change the ability of the developer to be able to honor their payment of the $350,000. He also noted if the School District purchases a part of the subject property, the City would still get their $350,000. These monies are not tied to the density of the project. · Paragraph VII, Sanitary Sewer, Provides for lift station impact fees which are tied to the density. Mr. Roger Gerstad noted the $17,470 required in the Agreement w as tied to the previously proposed density of 313 homes in the 118 acres. The number of units has been reduced by the City, however, there has been no mention of reducing these fees. Some discussion followed regarding the need to increase the capacity of the City's lift stations at River Road and on Boone Lagoon. · Paragraph VIII, Storm Water. Attorney McArdle noted this is standard language regarding surface water runoff. Discharge from the development would not cause any problems for area residents. Mr. Donald Gerstad requested the City clarify language in Paragraph VIII, reference the conveyance of everything by pipe except that runoff which exceeds the 100 year storm. Mr. Roger Gerstad noted there is currently runoff prior to the development and not everything should have to run through pipes. · Paragraph IX, Security, Provides for 5 Finals Plats, with one Preliminary Plat for the entire project. The document for securing all public improvements is the Letter of Credit. There will be a Letter of Credit to specifically secure the water main and sanitary sewer main. · Paragraph X, Off-Site and On-Site Improvements - Building Permits, Provides specifics with regard to public improvements required prior to issuance of building permits. · Paragraph XI, Schedule of Development, Provides that the first schedule of development must be provided to the City within 120 days of annexation of the subject property. · Paragraph XII, Donations, Contributions and Fees, Provides for the schedule of fees associated with the annexation: · A(4), Developer Donation Fees and Tax Lag Fees shall be adjusted annually on May 1st. Following a lengthy discussion, it was the consensus of Council to revisit this issue once all other points contained in the agreement have been agreed to. · A(5), It was determined if the State should change the law regarding Developer Donations, all funds would still be distributed to the appropriate taxing bodies and not be retained by the City. · B, Public Lands, Provides for the donation of cash rather than public lands. Both School District 15 and 156 have indicated they would prefer funds. Mayor Cuda indicated this item will have to be addressed more closely once all other issues are resolved. · E, Roads, City Administrator Lobaito explained how he arrived at the $8,000 figure contained in sub-paragraph XIIE(8). He noted the traffic signal cost would be shared by all who benefited from the installation of the signal. He judged the fare share of the developer to be $8,000. · J(1), Model Home Construction, Sales Office, etc., Mr. Roger Gerstad stated he has concerns regarding this paragraph and being permitted to have a sales office which could be utilized only for this particular subdivision. This paragraph will be addressed by Attorney McArdle and the Attorney for the Petitioners. · J(4), Identical models, Some discussion followed regarding the change from every third to every second model shall not be identical. It appeared to be the consensus of Council every third model is preferable to every second. In any event, once determined, there will be no variance unless granted by Staff. October 21, 1998 Page 3 Committee of the Whole · XIV, Obligations, Provides for the obligations of the developer(s), no matter the ownership of the property. Attorney McArdle noted the remainder of the document was standard annexation language. A lengthy discussion ensued. The following points were raised for further consideration by Council prior to the ratification of the agreement: · Alderman Baird opined the density should not exceed 280 with a 2.37 ratio per acre. · Mayor Cuda noted in all probability some of the property would be purchased by School district 156, and the 280 homes would not be a reality. He stated the importance of the City securing the $350,000 for Capital Development. It's imperative this project move forward so water can be brought east of the Fox River. · Mr. Donald Gerstad declared a density ratio of 2.37 units/acre is not viable. Following discussion, it was the consensus of all present the density is what will make or break this agreement. · Mayor Cuda opined RS-2 Zoning should prevail, at whatever the density works out to be on the property remaining, following purchase or legal taking by either/or School district 156 and/or IDOT. · Alderman Murgatroyd stated he would expect movement on both sides. Mr. Donald Gerstad stated he believes IDOT will exercise their option regarding FAP420. He could not then live with a maximum density of 2.37 units/acre. Alderman Glab asked the maximum number of units permitted in an RS-2 District. City Administrator Lobaito responded it would work out to approximately 2.5 or 2.6/acre after installation of public improvements, detention, etc. · Mayor Cuda directed Attorney McArdle to redraft paragraph III(6) so there is a maximum number of units permitted unless there is an IDOT taking and/or School District 156 taking, the balance of the property would revert to the maximum number of units permitted in the RS-2 District as defined by ordinance. ADJOURNMENT Motion by Murgatroyd, seconded by Glab, to adjourn the meeting at 11:15 p.m. Voting Aye: Bolger, Glab, Murgatroyd, Baird. Voting Nay: None. Absent: McClatchey. Motion carried. The meeting was adjourned at 11:15 p.m. DEPUTY CLERK MAYOR