Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - 09/14/1989 - Committee of the WholeCOMMITTEE MEETING OF THE WHOLE THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 14, 1989 A Committee Meeting of the Whole of the McHenry City Council was called to order by Mayor Busse on Thursday, September 14, 1989 at 7:40 p.m. at City Hall. At roll call the following Aldermen were present: Patterson, Lieder, Teta, Bolger, Serritella. Alderman Donahue arrived at 7:42 p.m. and Alderman Smith arrived at 7:55 p.m. Absent: McClatchey. City staff in attendance were Attorney Narusis, Director of Public Works Batt, Building & Zoning Enforcement Officer Halik and Assistant to City Clerk Martn. Mayor Busse announced that the purpose of the Committee Meeting of the Whole was to discuss the following items: 1. Proposed scavenger contract, bid proposal and Environmental Adivsary Committee (EAC) recommendation of 8-29-89. 2. Proposed McHenry waterfront tax increment district improvements. 3. Mobil Oil Co. and Fritsch annexations and Backhaus and Brackmann extension of Annexation Agreement. The proposed scavenger contract, bid proposal, EAC recommendation and the current waste hauler's letter of concerns regarding the proposed recycling contract were discussed, with the following questions needing to be resolved or information secured: - Secure data from surrounding communities that have initiated recycling. - Get bid proposals on both the existing refuse pickup service and for refuse and recyclable material collection and disposal service. - Define roll of Administrator position on recycling contract. - Determine size of plastic containers needed for recyclable itemsand whether covers are needed. - Should City provide initial recycling container with additional cost to be paid by resident for lost, stolen or destroyed container and what should be the cost of the replacement. - Should paper bags vs, plastic bags be used for refuse pickup and determine where are they to be purchased. (Paper bags take up more room on trucks and shelves whereas most plastic bags are not biodegradable). - Should contract include multi -family units by providing one large recycling depository. Busse closed the discussion on the recycling contract by saying tr,:,t ne felt the majority of residents would favor some sort of curbside recycling program in order to comply with recent State of Illinois legislation passed for developing a waste management plan. Busse began the next agenda item for discussion by giving a status report on the Fox Bay annexation and waterfront tax increment district. He stated that no public hearings have been scheduled and none would be until the matter of the Army corps of Engineers' permit is resolved. One of the conditions that the Corps of Engineers might want before issuing the permit, could be the establishement of a Special Area Management Plan (SAMP) which the Chain of Lakes - Fox River Water Management Agency would probably oversee. This new agency, if created, would regulate development along the Fox River corridor from the Wisconsin state line all the way to Algonquin or even further. A SAMP agency would regulate land use, access to the river and management of river traffic. Since funding of a full -fledge SAMP could delay it a number of years because the Counties just do not have the money, a modified SAMP program could be initiated. Busse said a SAMP program could raise problems for the local governments along the river because SAMP would regulate land use which Cities and Villages normally do with their Comprehensive Plans and Zoning laws. Thursday, September 14, 1989 Page 2. Once the permit question is resolved, then the next phase of resolving local concerns can begin, Busse said. Busse stated that Phase 2 of the TESKA redevelopment plan was nearly complete with the exception of determining the amount of acceptable costs and debt service. Discussion followed on the preliminary figures contained in the Public Infrastructure Costs' "TIF vs. Developer Responsibility" worksheet which is attached to these minutes. Busse explained that of the $22,000,000 public infrastructure costs, 76% would be paid by TIF bonds and 24% by the developer. The bonds would be paid by the real estate taxes generated and not by the City. The developer's $120,000,000 cost of constructing the Fox Bay project breaks down to $35,000,000 for the resort/marina, $22,000,000 for resort time-share condominiums, $34,000,000 for a shopping center and $8,000,000 for an office center, with a second phase of offices and retail center completing the $120,000,000 expenditure. The Aldermen felt that much more information was needed and asked for a time -scenario using the 76% TIF figure of $17,000,000, to show what benefits would be derived for the City and school districts and now soon would these benefits be realized through each phase of the development. Busse said he hoped to have this information plus the Jobs Created Study done by Northern Illinois University within a short time. Clerk Gilpin arrived at 9:20 p.m. Mayor Busse called for a recess at 9:22 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 9:35 p.m. with everyone, except Alderman Patterson, in attendance. Mayor Busse gave a status report on the following annexation petitions: I. Mobil Oil Co. Busse stated that Mobil had substantially revised the site plan that had been reviewed by the Zoning Board and included the following differences: 1. The 13,000 square foot retail space including associated parking space and driveways has been omitted 2. The Convenience Store has been detached from the 13,000 square foot retail space and relocated directly at the corner of Crystal Lake Road and Bull Valley Road (area has been increased by 600 square feet). 3. Driveway on Crystal Lake Road and Bull Valley Road has been widened at the recommendation of the City staff. 1. Parking for the Convenience closer to right-of-way and building setback line. Store has been moved 30 feet now is within the 30 foot 5. Landscape setback on Bull Valley Road has been decreased by 40 feet. 6. A new use has been added to the site of a quick oil change facility including two service bays and a 540 square foot office facility. (Alderman Patterson returned to the meeting at 9:40 p.m.) Because Mobil added the additional use of a quick oil change facility, some of the Aldermen thought they should go back to the Zoning Board. After further discussion the Aldermen agreed that Mayor Busse should convey all the concerns expressed tonight back to the Petitioner and set a Special Meeting with the Petitioner to resolve the concerns, including the option of going back to the Zoning"Board. Thursday, September 14, 1989 Page 3. II. Backhaus and Brackmann (Extension of Winding Creek Annexation Agreement). The original Annexation Agreement has expired as of 7-16-89 and a temporary extension of the Agreement has been given to 10-14-89. Mayor Busse went over the original concept plan which showed: Area a 230 acres of mainly single family homes on 675 lots containing minimum 9,000 square feet. Area D 27 acres containing 75 single family lots with minimum 10,000 square feet. Area c 12 acres containing no more than 160 multi -family units. Area d 20 acres containing 192 condominium units. This area was involved in a lawsuit which was resolved by an agreed order changing the land use to include some single family units, providing buffering and putting the multi -family units way back away from Curran Road. Area e 22 acres containing 176 condominium units. Area f 12 acres for B-1 which is now C-1 Convenience Commercial with conditions. Area g 50 acres which originally was to be dedicated for public use. Area h 8 acres to be used solely for open space, park, storm water retention or other public use. Area i 4 acres designated R-1. Busse stated that some of the Agreement provisions are in default including: - Dartmoor Drive which should have been extended all the way to Curran Road within 7 years from the date of the Agreement - sometime in 1986. - The City did not receive all the parkland that was to be dedicated - 11 acres short. The majority of the Aldermen felt that Winding Creek should remain residential in character and that the Agreement should be re -negotiated eliminating the multi -family sections and either scaling back or possibly eliminating the commercial area. Busse is to contact Backhaus to present the Aldermen's views and to set up a Special Meeting to negotiate the terms. III_ Fritsch Busse stated he had met with the developer and some of his staff and initially they wanted to put in 1200 units plus a golf course, but the Petitioner is now willing to Cut the units back to approximately 800 units with larger lots along with the golf course. Busse also said that the developer donation fees no longer seem to be a problem and that we should probably proceed with a Special City Council Meeting to review all items. Mayor Busse adjourned the meeting at 10:40 p.m. ssistant to ity erc i4ty wavaON`i