Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - 09/21/1994 - City Council REGULAR MEETING SEPTEMBER 21, 1994 The Regular Meeting of the McHenry City Council was called to order by Mayor Cuda at 7:30 P.M. on Wednesday, September 21, 1994 in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Center. At roll call the following Aldermen were present: Bolger, Locke, Bates, Lawson, Baird. Absent: None. City Staff in attendance were: City Clerk Althoff, City Administrator Peterson, City Attorney McArdle, Director of Building and Zoning Lobaito, Director of Public Works Batt, Director of Parks and Recreation Merkel, Chief of Police Joyce. Absent: None. TER MINUTE PUBLIC INPUT SESSIOft No one signed up to speak during the Ten Minute Public Input Session. PUBLIC HEARING Mayor Cuda convened the Public Hearing on the Busch/Knox annexation and zoning at 7:31 P.M. Attorneys Thomas Rupp, Guy Youman, and Daniel Curran representing the petitioners were present, along with Ted Johnson of Thompson, Dyke and Associates, Ltd. Planning Consultants, and Court Reporter Cheryl Barone. Attorney Curran explained that the petitioners were requesting annexation and zoning of approximately 69 acres of land located on the northeast and northwest corners of Bull Valley Road and South Green Street. The petitioners have agreed to dedicate 11 acres of this property for a Bull Valley Road bypass. Attorney Curran explained that since the initial concept plan was presented in June of 1992, substantial revisions have occurred as follows: 4TH REVISED CONCEPT PLAN DATA PRESENTED AT SEPTEMBER 21, 1994 MEETING LAND USE D.U./ACRE TOTAL ACRES UNITS/S.F. % LAND USE Single Family (RS-2) 2.0 12.5 25 18% Cluster Condominium (RM-1) 14.0 4.8 67 7% Commercial .25 FAR 8.5 92,565 s.f. 13% Office .50 FAR il.2 243,936 s.f. 16% Open Space 20.9 ---- 30% Bull Valley Corridor 11.0 ---- 16% 68.9 100% 3RD REVISED CONCEPT PLAN DATA PRESENTED AT SEPTEMBER 28, 1992 MEETING LAND USE D.U./ACRE TOTAL ACRES UNITS/S.F. % LAND USE Single Family (RS-2) 2.0 12.5 25 18% Cluster Condominium (RM-1) 14.0 10.6 148 15% 1 Commercial .25 FAR 3.2 34,848 s.f. 5% Office .50 FAR 12.1 263,538 s.f. 18% Open Space 19.5 ---- 28% Bull Valley Corridor 11._0 ---- 16% 68.9 100% 2ND REVISED CONCEPT PLAN DATA PRESENTED AT AUGUST 24, 1992 MEETING is LAND USE D.U./ACRE TOTAL ACRES UNITS/S.F. % LAND USE Single Family (RS-2) 2.0 12.5 25 18.0% Cluster Condominium (RM-1) 14.0 10.6 148 15.0% Office/Commercial (C-3) .25 FAR 1.9 20,700 s.f. 3.0% Office (0-1) .50 FAR 13.9 302,700 s.f. 20.0% Open Space - 19.0 28.0% Bull Valley Road Corridor - 11.0 16.0% 68.9 100.0% REVISED CONCEPT PLAN SITE DATA PRESENTED AT JULY 20, 1992 MEETING: i LAND USE TOTAL UNITS TOTAL ACRES % LAND USE Single Fam. (RS-2) 20 6.2 9% Cluster Condominium (RM-1) 214 15.3 22% Office/Commercial (C-3) 48,000 GSF 4.4 6% Office (0-1) 287,500 GSF 13.2 20% Existing Road R-O-W 2.4 3% Bull Valley R-O-W Corridor 10.9 16% Open Space (2.5 Ac. Park & 14 Ac. Wetlands) 16.5 _ 24% 68.9 100% September 21, 1994 Page 2 CONCEPT PLAN SITE DATA PRESENTED AT JUNE 3, 1992 MEETING: LAND USE TOTAL UNITS TOTAL ACRES % LAND USE Single Fam. (RS-2) 11 5.7 8% Multi-Fam. 266 19.0 28% Commercial 166617 GSF 15.3 22% Office 188,774 GSF 8.3 12% Open Space 20.6 30% 68.9 100% Curran noted in particular, the reduction of multi-family units and office area and the increase in single-family units, commercial area, and open space. The miiSority use of the property will in fact be open space. Ted Johnson then reviewed the fourth revised site plan. Johnson noted the main element which regulates the highest and best use of this property is the proposed relocation of Bull Valley Road. The new site plan proposes a more, intense land use adjacent to the proposed Bull Valley Road bypass, and less intense use further north. ^� There being no questions from the Council on this presentation, Mayor Cuda opened the floor to public comment. The following individuals addressed the Council: Nora Brown of 602 S. Hilltop Blvd. stated her support of the Bull Valley bypass because of the increased traffic flow on existing the Bull Valley Road. James Brophy of the Fox Ridge subdivision, stated his support for the Bull Valley bypass because of increased traffic throughout McHenry. Mark Hagy of the Green Valley subdivision stated his concern with the multi-family home zoning. Bob Hetterman of the Green Valley subdivision stated his concern about the potential extension of Valley Road to the proposed Bull Valley bypass and the multi-family zoning. Mark Golonka -of 600 S. McHenry Avenue stated his concerns about current vandalism in his neighborhood and speeders on Bull Valley Road. Rick Schultz, Chairman of the McHenry County Economic Development Commission and Board Member of the McHenry Area Chamber of Commerce, spoke in favor of the Bull Valley bypass and the need for multi-family dwellings and affordable housing. Joe Depner of 3801 Bull Valley Road stated his opposition to the C-3, 0-1, and 0-2 zoning, as well as the temporary access to Bull Valley Road. He explained the difficulty he and his neighbors experience gaining egress and ingress to their personal driveways. Mr. Depner felt that when the proposed Commercial/Office development occurs further traffic congestion in this area will occur. Barbara Gilpin, former City Clerk and McHenry Economic Development Commission Board member, stated that traffic congestion has always been a problem in McHenry. The Bull Valley bypass is needed to assist commercial, industrial, and residential ratios to be more evenly distributed. The bypass will help draw industry and commercial development to the area which will assist in the lowering of property taxes. She also noted that in her official capacity as City Clerk, she had received many requests from "empty nesters" looking for condominium-type housing. In conclusion, Mrs. Gilpin stated that the annexation is just a land-use plan, not a subdivision process. Many problems regarding drainage and road locations can be addressed during this process. Leann Depner of 3801 Bull Valley Road stated her opposition to the Commercial zoning off of Bull Valley Road; she also requested clarification of what would be completed first, the bypass or the office/commercial development. Mayor Cuda explained that at this time, that question could not be definitively answered. 1 Paul Antons of 3321 Bull Valley Road stated his support for the bypass and his concern for the condition of the present Bull Valley Road due to heavy traffic usage. Frank Glamentea stated his support of the proposed bypass because of current road problems and associated vandalism, as well as his opposition to the multi-family housing. Kathleen Reese of 3303 Bull Valley Road stated her support of the Bull Valley bypass because of the heavy amount of traffic experienced on the present Bull Valley Road.. She was particularly concerned about child nr�ty. September 21, 1994 Page 3 Richard Witting of 104 N. Ronda Road asked if a wetlands study had been completed. City Administrator Peterson noted that Ken Fiske had done a study and that a 12-month permit processing period will occur to evaluate the study's findings. The study is available to any interested parties. James Zasada of 3517 Turnberry stated his concerns about drainage and water problems in the designated RS-2 area, as his property is adjacent to this property, and he is experiencing ongoing water problems. Jerry Yencich of, Green Valley subdivision stated his support of the proposed Bull Valley bypass, but his opposition to the multi-family housing. Kim Hassetch, his wife, stated her support of the proposed Bull Valley bypass, however, objected strongly to the Multi-family, Commercial and Office zoning. Michael Moushay of 229 Loch Glen Lane requested the Council listen to the residents' objections to the Busch/Knox zoning proposal and not grant approval of this annexation and its zoning. He also stated his objection to proposed roadways connecting to the Green Valley subdivision, as well as his concern with potential drainage problems in the RS-2 area. Anton Rebel of 4009 Maple Avenue noted the past practice of accepting free open space and the subsequent high maintenance costs of these areas. Mayor Cuda asked the attorney for the petitioners, Curran, if he would like to address the stated concerns and objections. Curran explained that the very concerns stated by many of the residents regarding heavy traffic flow and congestion on the existing Bull Valley Road confirm the petitioner's proposed zoning of Multi-family, Commercial, and Office areas adjacent to the proposed Bull Valley bypass. Single family zoning is inconsistent with high traffic thoroughfares. He also noted the need for multi-family homes for beginning professionals, single parent families, and "empty nesters". The proposed plan also shows single-family zoning north and adjacent to the multi-family zoning, buffering in effect, the Green Valley subdivision. In response to concerns raised regarding the impact on schools and City services, it was noted that the total project impacts little on City services, the schools, and the Library and Fire Districts. The total project accounts for additional sales tax dollars, and the petitioners have agreed to impact fees 10% higher than the last negotiated fees. The present Bull Valley Road will, upon construction of the proposed bypass, return to its residential status. In conclusion, attorney Curran also stressed that this plan has been �.. amended four times, reducing the commercial area and multi-family units substantially, and increasing the single-family units by only 14 lots. Ted Johnson, Senior Vice President of Thompson Dyke and Associates, also noted the residents' comments regarding the negative impact of the existing Bull Valley Road temporarily serving -as a collector road. As most people do not wish to live next to a busy collector road, Single-family zoning would be inappropriate for the area north of the proposed bypass. The land uses proposed for this area, Commercial and Office, are appropriate next to a major collector road. He also noted this was not a subdivision process, and that zoning was just a determination of the highest and best use of the property; and although Mr. Fiske's analysis of the wetlands indicate they were of high quality, it will be determined during the subdivision process whether all the designated RS-2 lots are buildable. He also stated that if the entire project were zoned Residential, it would have an adverse effect on the schools and City services. The allowance of Commercial zoning allows for a tax base to help off-set the costs of Residential zoning. In response to comments of the Multi-family spot zoning, Mr. Johnson explained that a 4-acre parcel, with frontage on a major collector street adjacent to 13 acres of open space, could not be considered spot zoning. Additional comments were taken from the audience supporting the Bull Valley bypass, but objecting to the Commercial, Office, and Multi-family zoning. Motion by Lawson, seconded by Bolger, to close the Public Hearing at 9:07 P.M. Voting Aye: Bolger, Locke, Bates, Lawson, Baird. Voting Nay: None. Absent: None. Motion carried. September 21, 1994 Page 4 Mayor Cuda called for a recess at 9:08 P.M. The meeting reconvened --1 at 9:20 P.M. , with everyone still in attendance. It was the consensus of the Council to review all paragraphs that contain substantive issues. City Attorney McArdle explained that the annexation agreement was divided into five sections: - Introductory .Section - Recitals - Title - Obligations of the City, may state the guarantees the City makes to the petitioners, as well as granting them any relief from certain ordinances. Title II - Obligations of the Owners - states the owners' intent to comply with all City ordinances, and any other issues the City specifically addresses in this section. - Title III - L.Reciyrocal Obligations - states the miscellaneous obligations not covered in the previous sections. - Title IV - Miscellaneous - addresses general boiler plate legal language associated with any binding agreement. Title I - Obligations of the City - would be the first area of substantive issue and- discussion. City Attorney McArdle then reviewed Title I', item by item. He asked for questions and/or comments about this section. City' Administrator Peterson noted that some minor language modifications had occurred. There were, however, no major changes. Alderman Bolger noted that the date on Page 5, Paragraph A. should be changed from "August, 1994" to "January, 1995". City Administrator Peterson stated also that additional language addressing how the various zoning districts are developed limiting the C-3 zoning district to one preliminary platting phase, and the remaining zoning districts to no more than two preliminary plats, has been included in Paragraph C. on Page 5. Mayor Cuda also noted that in the Title I section on Page 4, Paragraph B. and on Page 5, Paragraph C. , the City requires that the property may not be developed before being platted. It is understood that during this platting process, road extensions, drainage issues, engineering studies, setback, landscaping and architectural reviews are addressed and determined. Also during this process, there is ample time for public review and input. Mayor Cuda also reported that a contract for the purchase of the Edna Mae Johnson property has been signed, and the closing is scheduled for next Thursday, September 29th. Alderman Bates asked for clarification regarding the blanks on Page 1 in the Recitals section, as well as Paragraphs G. , H. , and L. on Page 2. He received acceptable clarification. In response to Alderman Baird's query, City Administrator Peterson explained that although part of the roads are presently served by Nunda Township, once the annexation of this property occurs, all roadways to their . far boundaries fall within the City of McHenry's jurisdictional responsibility, and the Township is so notified. City Attorney McArdle then reviewed the Title II section noting two corrections: (1) on Page 11, Paragraphs A. , B. , and C. will be deleted, as the access points are designated on the Master Plan; (2) on Page 12, Number 2. , the reference to the temporary road being dedicated to the City is incorrect, and will be modified. The City will not be - responsible for the road during the construction because of maintenance and liability concerns. City Attorney McArdle noted on Page 12, that the owners agreed to comply with landscape ordinance requirements, but have not agreed to any extraordinary landscaping, particularly along the south side of the existing Municipal Center and the southern boundary of the Green Valley subdivision. Paragraph I. on Page 17, restricts the multi-family units to those primarily owned by the resident and not leased to a third person. It is noted in Paragraph J. on Page 17 that although the owners have agreed to setbacks in accordance with the City's Zoning Ordinance, they feel the 200-foot setback requested by staff is unreasonable. Paragraph K. on Page 18 allows for the maintenance and repair of existing structures on the property until development occurs, September 21, 1994 Page 5 City Administrator Peterson then noted that inadvertantly the Library Operational Fees had not been included, and should be added to Section A. , Number 5. on Page 7. Also, on Page 9, the referenced "open space" in line 1 should not be construed to be "public land", but be used for stormwater management facilities for the adjacent parcels lying west of Green Street owned and maintained by the petitioner. City Administrator Peterson also noted that Page 13 of the agreement includes an allowable recapture agreement for the petitioners. Some discussion followed regarding development fees. Alderman Locke requested clarification of Paragraph I. on Page 17, particulary the phrase "primarily owned". City Attorney McArdle explained that the language was an attempt to restrict the development of rental apartment units. Discussion followed. Alderman Locke suggested the word "primarily" be stricken. Attorney Curran stated he would discuss this issue with the petitioners during the next recess. Alderman Bates suggested a reduction in the density from 14 units per acre to 8 units per acre. Discussion followed. It was the consensus of the Mayor and Council that the density remain at 14 units per acre. Paragraph J. 0-2 Setback, on Page 17, was then addressed. City Administrator Peterson explained that the owners have agreed to setbacks in accordance with the City's Zoning Ordinance, however, they feel the 200-foot setback requested by staff is unreasonable. Staff's concern was that as the office buildings east of the Municipal Center get taller, they will have a negative "looming" effect on the Municipal Center. The 200-foot setback will correct this potential problem, and help alleviate a walled corridor affect. Ted Johnson responded for the petitioners, stating that this particular parcel cannot accomodate a 200-foot setback without substantially reducing the development permitted. He also noted that the existing zoning ordinance require deeper setbacks for taller buildings. Further discussion followed regarding building height restrictions. Mr. Johnson noted that the highest floor level he could build, maximizing the space and meeting City setback, parking, and landscaping requirements would be a five-story building. City Administrator Peterson also noted that the City has been requiring a 2' or 3' landscaping berm to help mitigate setback concerns. All landscaping requirements are subject to Council review. City Attorney McArdle pointed out that the review would be limited to the ordinance requirements. Any additional criteria must, be stipulated in this agreement. Discussion continued. Mayor Cuda requested the petitioner's attorney to discuss this issue at the next recess and determine a setback further than 30' if possible. City Administrator Peterson then noted that Paragraph P. on Page 19, prohibits the issuance of a building permit _on any parcel until the requirements of the City's Subdivision Control Ordinance have been fully met. Alderman Bates asked for clarification on Pige 17, Paragraph K. City Attorney McArdle explained that non-conforming use restrictions cannot be imposed by the zoning ordinances on the existing buildings and/or property. At this time Alderman Bates requested a review of the agreement from the beginning, page by page. It was noted on Page 3, Paragraph A. , that the SF2 Parcel should have an RS-2 zoning classification. The time frame of property development in relation to the construction of the Bull Valley bypass was discussed. A suggestion was made to prohibit any development on this property until construction of the Bull Valley bypass begins. Attorney Curran noted at this time, with regard to the multi-family units and the language "primarily owned", that the petitioners would agree to a condominium declaration. The Council felt this would be an acceptable solution to `- the problem. Discussion continued regarding the definition of "beginning construction". Mayor Cuda requested Attorney Curran discuss with the petitioners the issue of prohibiting development until the construction of the Bull Valley bypass begins. Clarification of Page 7, 2. noted that the location of the referenced signal would be at the intersection of Bull Valley Road and Green Street. The pro rata basis will be paid by the individual developers and be based on the number of acreage they own in relation to the total number of this parcel's acreage. September 21, 1994 Page 6 Alderman Bates noted on Page 9, Paragraph 2 an absence of a park donation. Discussion followed noting that it was the petitioner's understanding that the donation of open space was in lieu of a park donation. As the Army Corps of Engineers requested that a public body own the remainder of the wetlands or open space, determination must be made by the Council if this open space is in fact a donation. Discussion continued. Mayor Cuda called for a recess at 11:55 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 12:10 A.M. with everyone still in attendance. The three outstanding issues to be addressed were setbacks, park donation, and the development of the property in relation to the construction of the Bull Valley bypass. Attorney Curran suggested the following compromise: development with no time restriction can occur on the single family parcel south of the Green Valley subdivision and on 50% of the Green Street office parcels, with the rest of the :development being prohibited until construction of the Bull Valley bypass is assured. Determination was made that "assured" or "beginning construction" occurs when the contract bids are let for .� construction of the Bull Valley bypass. Ted Johnson addressed the setback issue. His proposal was a 75' building setback along Green Street, unless some agency imposes a 75' or greater setback along the east boundaries, at which time the setback is to be renegotiated. Discussion followed. It was understood that the building setbacks can never be less than the present building code allows. Attorney Curran suggested a $212.00 park donation fee for all dwellings, regardless of the number of bedrooms. It is also understood that for the purposes of this agreement, the $212.00 is a partial parks donation fee, as open land and/or space is also being donated to the City by the petitioners. Motion by Lawson, seconded by Bolger, to pass an ordinance approving the Busch/Knox Annexation Agreement and authoring the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Agreement; to pass an ordinance annexing the Busch/Knox property; and to pass an ordinance zoning the Busch/Knox property. RS-2, RM-1, C-3, 0-1, 0-2, E-Estate (open space) and amending the City's Comprehensive Plan as to 0-2 Office in residential and C-3 "1 Commercial in Office, subject to the revisions discussed and to be included in the final draft of the Agreement prepared by the City Attorney, and approved by the Mayor and City Council. Voting Aye: Bolger, Locke, Lawson, Baird, Cuda. Voting Nay: Bates. Absent: None. Motion carried. Attorney McArdle explained that he would make the changes, highlight them in grey, and send out the amended agreement to the Mayor and Aldermen for their review. If no comments are forthcoming in the designated time frame, the Mayor and Clerk will execute the Agreement. CONSENT AGENDA Motion by Locke, seconded by Lawson, to approve the Consent Agenda with the additon of Supplemental August bills (distributed at meeting), as follows: (1) August 31, 1994 Regular City Council meeting minutes; (2) September 7, 1994 Regular City Council meeting minutes; (3) Block Party request from Carol Chrisman, September 24, 1994 from 12:00 Noon until 9:00 P.M. , Glen Drive; (4) Annual Joint Purchase Agreement with State of IL in amount of $54,200.00 for purchase of bulk rock salt; (5) Second Supplemental Resolution for MFT Funds in amount of $4,159.94 for street improvement on Route 31 from Pearl Street to Route 12; (6) August Bills for approval, as follows: September 21, 1994 Page 7 GENERAL FUND 78394 VOID --- 78395 Ric Watson 79.21 78396 A-Able Alarm Service Inc. 72.75 78397 Ace Hardware 918.19 78398 Acme Brick and Supply Co. 473.25 78399 Dan Adams Steel Service 250.41 78400 R.A. Adams Enterprises 5,759.56 78401 Aerial Equipment Inc. 197.59 78402 Aldridge Electric Inc. 4,676.30 78403 Alexander Lumber Co. 1,886.06 78404 Alexander Battery Co. Inc. 42.76 78405 Althoff Industries 308.75 78406 Ameritech Credit Corporation 1,234.27 78407 AT&T Global Info Solution 185.52 78408 Badger Uniforms 897.53 78409 B and H Industries 46.80 78410 Peter Baker & Son Co. 249.08 78411 Cheryl Ann Barone 1,883.70 78412 Barn Nursery & Landscape Ctr. 291.21 78413 Baxter & Woodman Inc. 167.65 78414 Berthold Nursery 163.00 78415 Bio-Systems 82.10 78416 Boncosky Oil Company 5,319.50 78417 Botts Welding & Truck Service Inc. 200.36 78418 Phillip Brady & Associates Inc. 950.00 78419 L.M. Brownsey Supply Company 7.85 78420 Bruce Municipal Equipment Inc. 267.18 78421 BSN Sports 57.42 78422 Burgess, Anderson & Tate Inc. 633.45 78423 Casey Equipment Company Inc. 433.42 78424 Cellular One - Chicago 94.45 78425 Century Automatic Sprinkler Co. 171.50 78426 Chicago Turf & Irrigation 663.94 78427 Chicago Sanitary Rag Company 101.88 78428 Chuck's Towing 35.00 78429 CLC Lubricants Co. 104.80 78430 Comark Inc. 26.95 78431 Commonwealth Edison 6,908.73 78432 Communications Revolving Fund 425.00 78433 Commonwealth Edison 835.91 78434 Cornwell Tools 29.15 78435 Craft Concrete Products Inc. 444.60 78436 Crescent Electric Supply Company 101.25 78437 Crystal Lake Tire & Battery Inc. 590.20 78438 Cummins/Onan Northern Illinois 84.36 78439 Curran Contracting Company 612.90 78440 Decker Supply Co. Inc. 612.77 78441 Door Systems 172.50 78442 Gregory T. Eckstein MD 62.50 78443 Ed's Rental & Sales 129.00 78444 Express Radio Inc. 5,621.00 78445 Extech Company 97.35 78446 Fischer Bros. Const. Co. Inc. 250.00 78447 Foto Fast 141.93 78448 George P. Freund Inc. 1,269.93 78449 Freund International 413.02 78450 Arthur J. Gallaher & Co. 100.00 78451 William J. Gitzke D/B/A G Communications 964.80 78452 General Truck Parts & Equipment 5.10 78453 The Green Environmental Group 1,200.00 78454 Ideal Uniform Service 133.60 78455 Instrument Sales Corporation 74.70 78456 JK Sign Company 190.00 78457 Jewel Food Stores 6.59 78458 Kar Products 649.71 78459 KDS Tech Services Inc. 75.29 78460 Kirchner Fire Extinguisher 368.00 78461 Lake-Cook Farm Supply Company 234.00 78462 Gary Lang Chevrolet Inc. 391.77 78463 Leach Enterprises Inc. 11.95 78464 LETN 388.00 78465 Liberty Flag & Specialty Co. 140.08 78466 Tom McCarthy 3,647.00 September 21, 1994 Page 8 GENERAL FUND (cont'd) 78467 McHenry County Supply Inc. 187.20 78468 McHenry County Historical Society 20.00 78469 McHenry Printing Services 332.96 78470 McHenry Specialties 867.98 78471 Meyer Material Company 1,332.26 78472 Miller Monument Company 1,423.00 78473 Monroe Truck Equipment 2,474.00 78474 NIMC's On-The-Job Occupaitonal Health 220.00 78475 Northern Illinois Gas 75.29 78476 Northeastern Illinois Planning Comm. 646.12 78477 Northshore Waste Control 1,125.00 78478 Northwest Auto Electric 42.00 78479 The Office Shoppe 5.80 78480 O.M.J.C. Signal Inc. 52.25 78481 PACE 5,009.54 78482 Parts Company of America 39.89 78483 Petersen Sand & Gravel 186.40 78484 Pioneer Truck Parts 8.98 78485 Pitney Bowes 209.01 78486 Precision Sharpening & Repair Inc. 33.41 78487 Quality Image Press Inc. 600.93 78488 Radicom Inc. 32.50 78489 James G. Raycr.aft D/B/A/ Raycraft Septic 325.00 78490 Rebars & Steel - 12.00 78491 Reilly, Graham, McAndrews & Cunabaugh 5,600.00 78492 Reliable Maintenance 228.00 78493 Rex Auto Body 408.00 78494 Rockford Industrial Welding Supply 129.99 78495 Ben Rosenfield 75.00 78496 Rotary 'Club of McHenry 173.72 78497 Erika Ryl 779.90 78498 Scan-Am Company 30.00 78499 Seyfarth, Shaw, Fairweather & Geraldson 1,117.40 78500 Sherman Plumbing & Heating Inc. 1,200.50 78501 Ronnie Singer 55.00 78502 Skokie Valley Asphalt 4,857.20 78503 Stan's Office Machines 236.14 78504 Thornton's Turf Nursery 299.25 78505 Traffic Control & Protection Inc. 212.50 78506 The University of Illinois 5,390.00 78507 Unitog Rental Services 178.15 78508 Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 105.61 78509 Warning Lites of Illinois 427.00 78010 Weber Transplanters Inc. 300.00 78011 Wolf Camera Inc. 197.91 78012 Zarnoth Brush Works Inc. 92.00 WATER/SEWER EgND 11175 VOID --- 11176 VOID --- 11177 Ace Hardware 845.37 11178 Dan Adams Steel Service 2,200.00 11179 R.A. Adams Enterprises 17.54 11180 Alexander Lumber Co. 33.65 11181 Althoff Industries 72.00 11182 Ameritech Credit Corporation 117.54 11183 Barn Nursery & Landscape Center 1,362.75 11184 Baxter & Woodman Inc. 8,357.05 11185 Berry Bearing Company 131.00 11186 Boncosky Oil Company 916.26 11187 Botts Welding & Truck Service Inc. 17.75 11188 Carey Electric Contracting Inc. 2,051.00 11189 Chemical Pump Sales & Service 262.49 11190 Chuck's Towing 45.00 11191 Commonwealth Edison 33,784.55 11192 Commonwealth Edison 1,032.72 11193 Crystal Lake Tire & Battery Inc. 181.94 11194 D'Angelo Natural Spring Water 41.65 11195 Ed's Rental & Sales 132.00 11196 Envirex Inc. 528.00 11197 Fischer Bros. Const. Co. Inc. 250.00 11198 Fisher Scientific 82.85 11199 Joseph D. Foreman & Co. 43.56 11200 George P. Freund Inc. 24.00 11201 G.C.C. Enterprises Inc. 500.00 September 21, 1994 Page 9 WATER/SEWER FUND (cont'd) 11202 Hardware Service Co. 310.38 11203 L & R Machine Co. 170.00 11204 Gary Lang Chevrolet Inc. 71.48 11205 Lewis Equipment II 30.75 11206 Marblehead Lime Co. 1,612.35 11207 McHenry Analytical Water Laboratory 144.00 11208 McHenry County Well & Pump Co. 9.80 11209 Metropolitan Pump Company 5,377.00 11210 Meyer Material Company 485.80 11211 Midwest Meter Inc. 52.80 11212 NCL of Wisconsin Inc. 93.15 11213 Northern Illinois Gas 2,055.72 11214 Parts Company of America 23.11 11215 Petersen Sand & Gravel 248.00 11216 Pitney Bowes 52.24 11217 Precision Sharpening & Rep. Inc. 10.87 11218 Rowell Chemical Corporation 1,176.88 11219 Sidener Supply Company 82.19 11220 Transmatic Transmissions Spec. 495.00 11221 Unitog Rental Services 230.00 11222 Waste Management North 92.00 11223 Water Products Company 459.95 �- 11224 WaterPro 184.83 11225 Woodland RDF 4,153.60 11226 Zep Manufacturing 148.26 RECREATION PROGRAMS FUND 4658 VOID --- 4659 Ace Hardware 51.86 4660 Ameritech Credit Corporation 25.19 4661 Arvidson Crystal Lake 47.14 4662 Barrington Transportation Co. 250.00 4663 Broadcast Engineering 8.00 4664 L.M. Brownsey Supply Company 143.68 4665 Chemical Pump Sales & Service 1,105.64 4666 Chicago Power Proressional Soccer 928.00 4667 Commonwealth Edison 1,395.86 4668 Crystal Manor Stables Inc. 208.00 4669 Foto Fast 13.15 4670 Keith Francke 67.00 4671 Stephen R. Garrelts D/B/A Garrelts Plumbing 745.57 4672 Gopher Sport 175.78 4673 Halogen Supply 44.97 4674 Jones Coach Travel 285.00 4675 William J. Kofler 342.00 4676 McHenry Printing Services 3,650.15 4677 McHenry Specialties 480.00 4678 Northern Illinois Gas 747.14 4679 Mark E. Priscaro 114.00 4680 Henry St. Clair 399.00 4681 Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 15.76 4682 West Shore Marine :1 114.00 4683 Patrick F. Wirtz 218.00 Voting Aye: Bolger, Locke, Lawson, Baird. Voting Nay: Bates. Absent: None. Motion carried. FINAL PAYMENT TO MAN BROS., INC FOR SOUTH RIVERFRONT PARK BOAT LAUNCH Tim Hartnett of Smith Engineering, and Stan Mills of Mann Bros. , Inc. were in attendance. Mr. Hartnett explained that the porous granular embankment quantity for the South Riverfront Park Boat Launch project was increased due to poor soil conditions. The additional granular embankment also lead to an increase in seeding costs. As soil conditions `-' are an unknown quantity, this additional cost was unforeseen. Motion by Bolger, seconded by Locke, to make the final payment of $27,020.87 to Mann Bros. , Inc. , for the South Riverfront Park Boat Launch project. Voting Aye: Bolger, Locke, Bates, Lawson, Baird. Voting Nay: None. Absent: None. Motion carried. September 21, 1994 Page 10 MAYOR - STATEM$NT AND REPORTS 60� Mayor Cuda reported that in an effort to assist the City of McHenry in obtaining the right-of-way for the Bull Valley bypass, the McHenry County Board approved the $26,500 payment toward purchase of the Edna Mae Johnson property by the City of McHenry. COMMITTEE REPORTS Director of Parks and Recreation Merkel noted that a request had come before the Parks . and Recreation Committee for use of the northwest portion of Petersen Park for a snowmobile grass drag, sponsored by the Harmony Snowmobile Club. The Committee recommended denying the request. James Kottke, Vice President of the Harmony Snowmobile Club, was in attendance and made a brief presentation. Discussion followed regarding potential damage to the park. Motion by Baird, seconded by Bates, to deny the request of Harmony Snowmobile Club for the use of Petersen Park for a snowmobile drag race. Voting Aye: Bolger, Bates, Baird. Voting Nay: focke, Lawson. .� Absent: Done. Motion carried. DEPARTMENT HEAD REPORTS Director of Public- Works Batt reported that he had been contacted by the McHenry County Conservation District and was asked to provide assistance on October 13 - October 18 with their Trail of History event by providing traffic cones, parking signs, handicapped signs, etc. It was the Council's consensus to assist in whatever way possible. City Clerk Althoff asked for Council action on setting Halloween Trick-or-Treat hours. The Council's consensus was to set Monday, October 31, 1994 from 3:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. for "Trick-or-Treating" hours. Motion by Bates, seconded by Locke, to adjourn. Voting Aye: Bolger, Locke, Bates, Lawson, Baird. Voting Nay: None. Absent: None. Motion carried. The meeting adjourned at 12:55 P.M. r � CITY C RK / MAYOR