HomeMy WebLinkAboutPacket - 09/25/2006 - Finance and Personnel Committee City of McHenry
333 South Green Street , www.ci.mchenry.il.us
McHenry,Illinois 60050-5495
7.
Mayor's Office
(815) 363-2108
Fax (815) 363-2119
Clerk's Office FINANCE/PERSONNEL COMMITTEE MEETING
(815)363-2100
Fax(815)363-2128
Administration Monday, September 25, 2006 — 6:-30 PM
(815)363-2108 City of McHenry Municipal Center
Fax(815)363-2119 333 South Green Street
Public Works Aldermen's Conference Room
Community
Development
(815)363-2170
Fax(815)363-2173
AGENDA
Parks and Recreation
(815)363-2160
Fax(815)363-3186
Police Non-Emergency
(815)363-2200
Fax(815)363-2149
Mayor 1. Purchase of Wireless Alarm Monitoring System
Susan E.Low
City Clerk 2. Adjournment
Janice C.Jones
Tlreasurer
David M.Welter
Aldermen
WARD 1
Victor A. Santi
WARD
Andrew A.Glab
WARD 3
Jeffrey A. Schaefer
Posted and Delivered:09/20/2006
WARD
Steven C.Murgatroyd
WARD 5
Richard W.Wimmer
WARD 6
Robert J.Peterson
WARD 7
Geri A.Condon
FINANCE AND PERSONNEL COMMITTEE
TO: Finance and Personnel Committee
FROM: Douglas P.Martin,Assistant City Administrator
FOR: September 25,2006,Finance and Personnel Committee
RE: Purchase of a Wireless Alarm Monitoring System
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To direct Staff to prepare a Request for Proposal,for City Council consideration,
to solicit responses to provide a wireless municipal alarm monitoring system.
Staff has been investigating the possibility of converting the current alarm monitoring system in the police
department to a wireless system. Currently,any new business in the City has the option of directly connecting to the
alarm monitoring system located in the police dispatch center. When the offsite alarm is triggered a direct signal is
sent to the municipal center through a phone line. The City does not require businesses to connect to the system but
does require each business to have an Underwriters Laboratory (UL) approved fire alarm system at their facility.
Currently, there are 128 connections tied into the City's alarm board. There are another 24 nonpaying subscribers
and the majority of these are City-owned facilities, such as lift stations or remote buildings, as well McHenry
Township Fire Protection District facilities.
Currently Norshore Alarm owns and maintains the alarm monitoring board in the dispatch center;however, there is
no written agreement currently in place with Norshore. Staff has been attempting to convince Norshore to update
their equipment,which is approximately 30 years old,but they have not responded. Consequently,staff has initiated
discussions with two alarm monitoring companies, Inner Security Systems and Chicago Metropolitan Fire
Prevention, about providing wireless equipment to the City. Below is a comparison between the City's existing
alarm monitoring system and a new wireless alarm monitoring system.
Existing Alarm Monitoring System New Wireless Alarm Monitoring System
Uses phone lines Uses no hard wiring
Linked via individual phone lines User radios form a wireless web network
UL allows up to 15 min. emergency response Emergency response within 2-3 minutes
Existing equipment is 30 years old Brand new system would be installed
City receives no income City to receive constant revenue stream
City does not own equipment City will own equipment
Multitude of false alarms occur Drastically reduces number of false alarms
Staff time-responding to false alarms Saves staff time-responding to false alarms
The City has a couple of options in regards to acquiring a wireless alarm monitoring service. The first is to have an
independent company own and maintain the entire system. An alternative is for the City to purchase the capital
equipment and maintain the system. If the City decided to purchase the equipment, an alarm monitoring company
could maintain the equipment for$10/account/month. In evaluating these options, Staff believes that it is in the best
interest of the City to own the equipment. The primary reasons are practical as well as financial. Practically, by
owning the equipment,the City is not tied to a long-term lease with an alarm monitoring company and has complete
control over the system. Financially, if the City owns the equipment, once the initial investment is recovered, the
City will receive a recurring revenue stream to offset the billing/administration costs,as well as funds to help defray
operating costs in the dispatch center.
Approximately 40% of the municipalities who have a wireless monitoring system own the system. Naperville has
had a wireless system for five years and Bloomingdale has had the same system for three years. In the first year,
Naperville's out-of-service accounts or the number of alarms not functioning properly at any one time decreased
86%and trouble signals dropped 28%.
Because the City dispatches for the McHenry Township Fire Protection District and the overwhelming majority of
the alarms monitored are fire,City staff has been working closely with officials from the fire protection district. The
district supports the transition to a wireless system for many of the reasons previously discussed. In addition, City
Staff, as well as Fire Chief Amore, visited the Algonquin Lake in the Hills Fire Protection District who purchased
the wireless alarm monitoring system approximately one year ago. In order to pay for the purchase,the district has
taken out a short term loan(5-year note) and uses recurring subscriber revenue to pay off the debt. In addition,the
district worked with the villages of Algonquin and Lake in the Hills in implementing ordinances which require all
businesses connected to a central alarm monitoring company to connect to the district's wireless alarm monitoring
system. By doing this,the debt is paid down quicker and the yearly revenue stream increases. The Algonquin Lake
in the Hills Fire District also likes the system because they use the revenue to pay user fees to the SECOM dispatch
center for dispatching services.
The fire districts strongly support this system for the simple fact that emergency response time is dramatically
reduced. Central alarm monitoring services essentially act as a "middle-man" in that when they receive an alarm
signal, they must then contact the local dispatch center. This process can legally take up to 15 minutes prior to the
arrival of an emergency responder to a fire.
In order to evaluate the financial implications of owning a wireless alarm monitoring system, Staff has attached a
spreadsheet showing potential annual revenues and expenses. The one-time capital equipment cost can be absorbed
up-front or paid over several years. Once the initial capital costs are paid, future revenue from the system can be
utilized for administrative expenses and costs involved with dispatching services. Subscriber billing would be
handled by the City and can be done quarterly, semi-annually or annually. Staff has outlined three potential
scenarios for consideration.
The municipal monitoring fee and monthly radio lease charges are common industry rates used by other
municipalities and the monthly maintenance charge of $10/account is also a standard rate. The revenue and
expenses are based on the City's current 128 subscribers with no assumptions made for additional subscribers to the
system. The loan rates are current rates charged by local financial institutions. If the City decided to purchase the
equipment upfront,this initial capital investment would be recovered in approximately 29 months. The City would
have to maintain a reasonable supply of radios for any new subscribers connecting to the system. If purchased,there
would be roughly a six month transition period from one system to the other.
The next step in this process,with the concurrence of the committee,is for Staff to bring forth a request for proposal
(RFP), for City Consideration, to solicit responses from alarm monitoring companies to provide a wireless
monitoring system to the City.
2
Capital Equipment Costs
Individual radio cost $1300 (128 current hook-ups) $166,400
Receiving equipment $68,750 ($20,000 installation) $88,750
$255,150
Yearly Revenue
Municipal monitoring fee $30/month(128 connections) $46,080
Monthly radio lease charge $40/month(128 connections) $61,440
$107,520
Option 1 Purchase equipment upfront Payoff on initial investment 28.48 months
Option 2 2-year loan*
Yearly Expenses
Maintenance charges (recurring expense) $10/month(128 connections) $15,360
Loan payment for receiving equipment $11,194/month $134,328
$149,688 (Expenses)
107 520 (Revenue)
Option 3 $42,168 (Deficit)
3-year loan**
Yearly Expenses
Maintenance charges (recurring expense) $10/month(128 connections) $15,360
Capital Equipment Costs $7,647/month $91,764
$107,124 (Expenses)
107 520 (Revenue)
$396 (Surplus)
*2-year loan based on 5% interest-total interest cost of$13,506
**3-year loan based on 5% interest-total interest cost of$20,142