HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - 07/06/2005 - City Council REGULAR MEETING
JULY 6, 2005
The Regular Meeting of the McHenry City Council was called to order by Mayor Low
at 7:30 P.M. on Wednesday, July 6, 2005 in the Council Chambers of the Municipal
Center. At roll call the fallowing Aldermen were present: Santi, Glab, Murgatroyd, Wimmer,
Peterson, and Condon. Absent: Schaefer. City Staff in attendance were: City
Administrator Maxeiner, Assistant to the City Administrator Martin, City Clerk Jones, City
Attorney Fetzner, Chief of Police O'Meara, Director of Public Works Marcinko, Director of
Community Development Napolitano, Director of Parks and Recreation Merkel and
Community Relations Management Assistant Hobson. Absent: Director of Finance Kline
and City Attorney McArdle.
TEN MINUTE PUBLIC INPUT SESSION
Mayor Low acknowledged a number of individuals had signed in to speak at the
Public Input Session. She noted all the parties wished to address Council regarding the
Mill Street Station rezoning issue. Mayor Low stated, while tonight's meeting is not a
Public Hearing, she would present an opportunity for designated spokespersons to
address Council when the matter was presented on the Agenda.
CONSENT AGENDA
Motion by Wimmer, seconded by Santi, to approve the Consent Agenda as
presented:
A. Ordinance granting a Map Amendment for Lot 7, Adams Commercial
Centre;
B. Prevailing Wage Ordinance for Fiscal Year 2005/2006;
C. Parking Lot Control Agreement— McHenry High School District 156;
D. Picnic Permit Requests;
E. Block Party Requests:
a. Jim Bowles, 3004 West Miller Drive, McHenry Shores Subdivision;
F. Regular City Council Meeting Minutes:
a. September 20, 2004
b. October 11, 2004
c. October 18, 2004
d. November 1, 2004
G. Committee of the Whole Minutes
a. September 27, 2004.
Voting Aye: Santi, Glab, Murgatroyd, Wimmer, Peterson, Condon.
Voting Nay: None. -
Absent: Schaefer.
Motion carried.
ADVANCED REFINANCING OF 1997A AND 2002 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS
City Administrator Maxeiner reiterated that Council approved an Ordinance on May
23, 2005, for the refunding of the City's outstanding General Obligation Bonds Series
'L 1997A and 2002.
City Administrator Maxeiner stated that tonight Staff is seeking Council's Statement
July 6, 2005
Page 2
of Intent regarding the sale of the bonds. The bid opening took place on July 6, 2005. The
Statement of Intent would meet the needs of the bond underwriters, with a formal vote on
the bond sale taken on July 11, 2005, prior to the Committee of the Whole meeting
scheduled on that date.
Mr. Daniel Forbes, Vice-President of Speer Financial, explained bond refinancing.
He stated that following the sale of the bonds, in order to accomplish the restructuring, the
par amount of the Bonds was adjusted to $2,560,000. He noted the sale of the bonds
resulted in a present value savings of over$25,700.
Alderman Murgatroyd stated sale of the bonds provides flexibility. He opined he
was pleased the interest rate was reduced.
It was the consensus of Council to move forward with the refinancing of the 1997A
and 2002 General Obligation Bonds.
REQUEST FOR AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT — SHEPHERD OF THE
}TILLS LUTHERAN CHURCH, 404 NORTH GREEN STREET
Director of Community Development Napolitano informed Council that Shepherd of
the Hills Lutheran Church, located at 404 North Green Street, has been serving the
community for forty years. In an effort to meet the needs of a growing congregation, which
numbers over 4,000 members, Reverend Roger Schneider is requesting Council consider --
approving expansion of Shepherd of the Hills' existing parking area.
Director Napolitano indicated the expansion would be at the southeast portion of the
site. He noted a net gain of 49 additional parking spaces would be achieved. Director
Napolitano stated the expansion has been designed to reflect the conditions of the existing
parking lot, which is asphalt with no curb and gutter. Staff has ascertained that
connections to the existing parking area are at logical locations and provide for easy traffic
flow. Director Napolitano noted additional lighting arms would be installed on two existing
light poles to provide illumination for the new parking area.
Director Napolitano informed Council the Zoning Ordinance states that any
expansion, enlargement or structural alteration of a Conditional Use requires that the
applicant first appear before the City Council, which may grant the proposed amendment
or refer the applicant to the Planning and Zoning Commission for a new Public Hearing.
Director Napolitano stated Staff has no concerns with the proposed parking lot
expansion. The parking is needed for the existing use and the proposed layout would
provide safe and logical traffic movement. Due to the amount of impervious surface being
added to the site, no storm water detention is required. While open space would be lost,
the new parking area would still be nearly 80-feet from the rear lot lines of the homes to
the east on Shepherd Hill Lane. Staff recommends Council approve the amendment to the
Conditional Use Permit without referring the matter back to the Planning and Zoning "
Commission.
Responding to Alderman Condon's inquiry, Director Napolitano indicated the
July 6, 2005
Page 3
Applicant is familiar with the City's Lighting Ordinance.
�-- Director Napolitano, responding to Alderman Glab's inquiry regarding additional
flow of water, stated that existing drainage swales would be used and the additional flow of
water falls within the requirements. City Engineer Robert Wegener of Smith Engineering
Consultants, Inc. informed Council the expansion would have no impact on the flow of
water as the area being considered is less that 100 feet by 200 feet, creating no additional
flow in ditch lines,
Motion by Wimmer, seconded by Condon, to accept Staffs recommendation, to
direct Staff to prepare an ordinance amending the Conditional Use Permit for Shepherd of
the Hills Lutheran Church, located at 404 North Green Street, to allow an expansion to the
parking area in accordance with the plans submitted.
Voting Aye: Santi, Glab, Murgatroyd, Wimmer, Peterson, Condon.
Voting Nay: None.
Absent: Schaefer.
Motion carried.
PLAT OF RE-SUBDMSION FOR LOTS 16 AND 18, PLAT OF VACATION FOR LOT 6
AND PLAT OF DEDICATION FOR LOT 17 - PRAIRIE POINT SUBDIVISION
Director Napolitano reiterated to Council that in June 2003 Council approved the
Final Plat for the Prairie Pointe Subdivision, located at State Route 31 and Veterans
Parkway. The Final Plat divided the property into 18 lots for development. He noted
Patriot Drive, which extends north and east from Veterans Parkway, provides access to the
lots in the subdivision. Additionally, access from Veterans Parkway was granted through
an easement on Lot 6.
Director Napolitano stated that in order to accommodate the needs of a potential
purchaser, Family Services, the Applicant is requesting approval of a re-subdivision of
Lots 16 and 18. The proposed re-subdivision would reconfigure Lots 16 and 18 resulting
in two new lots, Lot 1 of the subdivision would have 2.69 acres and would be accessed
from Patriot Drive, Lot 2 would consist of 9.53 acres, including buildable area for Family
Services and the detention pond for the subdivision. A new access easement from
Veterans Parkway would provide access to the new Lot 2. A Plat of Dedication has been
provided. Director Napolitano noted to off set the new access from Veterans Parkway, the
existing easement on Lot 6 would be vacated. He stated a Plat of Vacation has been
submitted.
Staff indicates no concerns with the proposed Plat of Resubdivision, Plat of
Vacation or Plat of Dedication. The proposed re-configuration would have no impact on
the remainder of the subdivision and would accommodate a user and facilitate additional
development in the subdivision. Director Napolitano informed Council the Planning and
Zoning Commission at its June 16, 2005 regularly scheduled meeting unanimously
`t- recommended approval of the Plat of Resubdivision for Lots 16 and 18 of the Prairie
Pointe Subdivision subject to the following conditions:
• A left turn lane shall be provided from Veterans Parkway to the new access
July 6, 2005
Page 4
easement;
• The 20' municipal utility easement shall be renamed to a Water Service Easement;
and
• The driveway crossing over the drainage easement shall be reviewed by the City
Engineer.
Director Napolitano stated the Applicants have agreed to the conditions proposed by the
Planning and Zoning Commission and the Plat has been revised to reflect the conditions.
Mayor Low suggested this matter be voted upon in two separate motions for
clarification.
Responding to Alderman Santi's inquiry, Director Napolitano stated the condition
that the Plat be recorded within six months of Council approval provides the developer with
an adequate amount of time.
Alderman Glab stated he is unable to support this matter due to drainage concerns.
Motion by Murgatroyd, seconded by Condon, to accept the unanimous
recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission, to direct Staff to draft an
ordinance approving the Plat of Resubdivision for Lots 16 and 18 in the Prairie Point
Subdivision, subject to the condition that the Plat be recorded within six months of Council
approval. ,
Voting Aye: Santi, Murgatroyd, Wimmer, Peterson, Condon.
Voting Nay: Glab.
Absent: Schaefer.
Motion carried.
Motion by Wimmer, seconded by Santi, to approve the Plat of Vacation for Lot 6 and
the Plat of Dedication for Lot 17.
Voting Aye: Santi, Murgatroyd, Wimmer, Peterson, Condon.
Voting Nay: Glab.
Absent: Schaefer.
Motion carried.
REQUEST FOR ZONING MAP AMENDMENT, VARIANCES AND PRELIMINARY PLAT
APPROVAL - MILL STREET STATION, 801 MILL STREET
Alderman Condon departed Council Chambers at 7:49 p.m.
Mayor Low acknowledged many residents in attendance with an interest in this
mater. She stated she would recognize two participants from the audience for comments
following Council's discussion on the topic. —'
Director Napolitano stated Applicant, SW Venture IV, LLC, is requesting a Map
Amendment to RM-2, High-Density Multi-Family Residential in order to construct the
Townhomes of Mill Street Station, an upscale townhome development containing 26 units.
July 6, 2005
Page 5
Director Napolitano informed Council the development would consist of four townhome
buildings, two 6-unit and two 7-unit buildings. Garages would face the interior of the site.
The property would have one access point onto Mill Street and include guest parking for
eight vehicles. A storm water detention basin is proposed at the northwest corner of the
property. The Applicant is also requesting approval of variances for minimum lot width and
to allow multiple buildings on a Zoning Lot.
Director Napolitano stated regarding the Map Amendment, the character of the area
near the site is mixed with industrial uses to the north, multi-family to the south and east
and single family to the west. The Comprehensive Plan designates the site as High
Density Multi-Family Residential which indicates a density of nine plus units per acre. The
proposed 26-units on 2.73 acres yields a density of 9.5 units per acre, and is compatible
with the land use designation of the Comprehensive Plan. Staff opined the proposed
density provides a good transition between the existing apartments, 18-units per acre, and
single-family homes, 2.9 units per acre. The development is also in close proximity to the
Main Street area of downtown McHenry and the Metra Station. Higher densities are
appropriate near these areas.
Director Napolitano indicated that four buildings would be placed parallel to Mill
Street, a minimum of 32-feet from the rear property line and 25-feet from the west side lot
line. The buildings would be setback 41 feet from the rear lot lines of the single-family
homes on Crestwood Drive. He noted that the site slopes severely, approximately 22-feet,
from the south to the north. The Applicant would use retaining walls at the rear of the site
to ease the grade change and accommodate the proposed buildings. The height of the
proposed retaining walls is approximately 10 feet, which would reduce the overall height
appearance of the buildings in relation to surrounding single-family homes. Director
Napolitano noted hat full protection is required for any wall in excess of four feet in height,
Applicant has proposed landscaping the area.
Regarding the variances requested by Applicant, Director Napolitano commented as
follows:
• Staff has no concerns regarding the variance for lot width and the variance to allow
multiple buildings on a Zoning Lot. The lot is uniquely shaped and gets wider
towards the rear of the lot. There is sufficient room to accommodate the proposed
development and there is enough lot width for the driveway and parking area
leading to the units.
• The Zoning Ordinance requires that only one principal building be located on a
zoning lot. The Applicants are proposing to have all four buildings on one lot with
easements for utilities and access. Director Napolitano noted this request is typical
for townhome developments and Staff has no concerns.
Director Napolitano advised Council that with the exception of a few minor.
corrections, the Preliminary Plat is in compliance with the requirements of the Subdivision
Control Ordinance. The site would be served with sanitary sewer and water in accordance
with City engineering requirements, A storm water detention area has been provided at the
northwest comer of the lot.
July 6, 2005
Page 6
Staff recommends a back-up special service area be established to provide for the
maintenance, of common areas should the Homeowners Association fail to sufficiently
maintain the common areas.
Director Napolitano informed Council that the Planning and Zoning Commission at a
Public Hearing held on June 2, 2005 recommended approval of the requested map
amendment, variances and Preliminary Plat approval.
Mayor Low recognized Mr. Stanley Sumner, of SW Venture, developer of the
project. Mr. Sumner stated the developer feels the project would elevate the values of
surrounding properties. Noting the irregular shape of the property, Mr. Sumner
emphasized the project's plan to eliminate exposure to the adjacent single-family
development. Responding to an inquiry, Mr. Sumner indicated a Traffic Study was
conducted and provided to Staff for review. Results of the Traffic Study indicate a modest
impact on neighborhood traffic.
Mr. Sumner stated the cost of the units would be slightly above $200,000. The
developer feels the units are priced competitively with other multi family projects in the
area and would appeal to younger, urban purchasers. The developer is proposing an
attractive buffer between the single-family, industrial and multi-family uses.
Mayor Low requested three separate motions be made regarding the Zoning Map
Amendment, variances, and Preliminary Plat approval. City Attorney Fetzner informed
Council that in order to pass the motion, four of the remaining five Aldermen must vote in
favor of the Zoning Map Amendment.
Motion by Wimmer, seconded by Murgatroyd, to accept the recommendation of the
Planning and Zoning Commission, to direct Staff to prepare an ordinance approving a
Zoning Map Amendment from RS-4, High Density Single-Family Residential to RM-2, High
Density Multi-Family Residential for Mill Street Station.
Alderman Wimmer express concerns regarding the number of parking spaces
provided for guests. Mr. Sumner pointed out that each unit has a 2-car garage as well as
two spaces available behind each building.
Responding to Alderman Wimmer's inquiry regarding the amount of parking
provided, Director Napolitano indicated there may be rare occasions when parking would
be insufficient. However, there is a parking lot located across the street from the
development. Staff noted they were more concerned with maintaining the green space.
Alderman Peterson indicated he would not support the project. He stated he would
like to see the Metra train station relocated to the south side of the City McHenry and
building a condominium complex of this nature would cement the train station remaining on
its present site.
Mayor Low requested City Clerk Jones to read the following letter from Alderman
Condon into the record:
July 6, 2005
Page 7
"Since I am unable to participate in the discussion on the Mill Street Station project,
I wanted to share with the City Council the comments I have received from my
constituents. I was contacted by more than a dozen residents of Cooney Heights, all of
whom oppose this project. The concerns they cited were all similar in nature.
First and foremost, this site is designated single family. There is a natural buffer of
a tree line between the single family homes that surround this site and the apartments to
the south. To put multi family on the "single-family" side of this buffer defeats the purpose
of the buffer and eliminates any buffer for the rest of the single-family homes.
Traffic and noise are also concerns of these residents. They said that they already
are dealing with semis, businesses and the traffic from the apartments. Noise from the
surrounding area carries to this spot and multiple housing will only escalate these
problems,
Finally, drainage is a concern. One adjoining property owner showed me where her
land floods and, with additional impervious surfaces, she fears the consequences she will
face if this project proceeds.
I ask you to include these concerns of the neighboring residents as you make your
decisions tonight."
Responding to Alderman Santi's request for clarification regarding buffering traffic,
Mr. Sumner stated the Traffic Study indicates a modest impact and no buffering would be
necessary. Mr. Sumner noted the big traffic generator is the apartment building currently
located in the vicinity.
Mr. Sumner stated there is an approximate 10-foot drop in elevation from the rear
to the front of the property. Alderman Santi indicated he had concerns regarding the
elevation change.
Alderman Glab stated that similar proposals have been presented to Council in the
past. He opined one of the maim issues is quality of life in the neighborhood. He indicated
he has concerns about placing multi family homes in a single-family residential area,
noting the City has no need for additional multi family dwellings at this time. Alderman
Glab stated emphatically he would not be supporting the project.
Responding to Alderman Murgatroyd's inquiry, Mr. Sumner stated the height of the
building in the back is 31 feet and in the front is 22 feet. Mr. Sumner indicated he was
unaware of the height from the bottom step to the roofline. Mr. Sumner briefly outlined the
developer's intent regarding structure details, such as trim work on the gables, types of
windows to be installed, overhangs, porch elements and lighting. Alderman Murgatroyd
opined he was not overly concerned with traffic issues. as approximately the same amount
of traffic would be generated by single-family residences versus multi-family residences.
Responding to an inquiry from Alderman Murgatroyd, Mr. Sumner indicated there is
nothing proposed in the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CCR) that prohibits the
July 6, 2005
Page 8
units being leased to a third party by the owner of the unit. Alderman Murgatroyd stated
he prefers owner-occupied multi family dwellings.
Alderman Murgatroyd stated he had some issues with the current density of the
project and would not support it in its present form. However, he did indicate a project of
this type if reasonable for the site and would entertain a variation.
Mayor Low recognized spokespersons from the audience.
Ms. Kathy Lynd of 813 North Mill Street stated she had traffic concerns regarding
both the commercial and residential traffic. She noted that Mill Street is approximately
1/10'h of a mile in length and is not even a full street. She expressed safety issue
concerns regarding the proximity of the bike trail and additional vehicular traffic in the area
should the project proceed. Ms. Lynd stated she personally counted 27 cars in nine
minutes and noted this was after the train had departed in the morning. She strongly
urged Council to reject the proposal.
Mr. Dale Koss of 4105 West Crestwood indicated that Cooney Heights is a quiet
neighborhood that currently has a good quality of life, Mr. Koss stated he canvassed the
neighborhood with Ms. Lynd regarding the project and everyone inquired why a
condominium complex was being proposed. He stated the development is too large for the
space available. Additionally, Mr. Koss noted concerns regarding traffic, parking, ---
increased noise volume, the increased risk of West Nile Virus resulting from the detention
pdnd, and issues concerning future residents leasing the condominiums from the owners.
Mr. Ron Wagner, a resident of 4316 West Sioux Lane, expressed his concerns for
the safety of residents due to increased traffic. He commended Alderman Condon on the
content of her letter. He emphatically stated that the current proposal is not the right
project for the site.
Mr. Sumner requested that the Motion be withdrawn and the matter tabled, until the
developer had an opportunity to revise the proposal.
Following advice from City Attorney Fetzner, Mayor Low stated that because a
motion is presently before Council, it is up to Council to proceed or withdraw the motion.
Alderman Glab stated the Applicant has had adequate time to prepare and present
_ his proposal. He opined the Applicant's motivation for withdrawal of the motion is because________
he feels he has insufficient support from Council to move forward with the project.
Responding to an inquiry from Alderman Murgatroyd, City Administrator Maxeiner
stated should the matter be tabled the Applicant would be required to make significant
changes to the proposal. Following those changes a Public Hearing would again be held
and the Applicant would again be required to go before the Planning and Zoning
Commission.
City Attorney Fenner stated that if the vote regarding the current motion is
July 6, 2005
Page 9
unfavorable, a motion could be made to reconsider, enabling the Petitioner to present the
project to Council within twelve months, conduct a Public Hearing and go before the
Planning and Zoning Commission.
Alderman Murgatroyd opined he would be in favor of tabling the issue. He indicated
it was the Applicant's choice whether or not to do so.
Motion by Wimmer, seconded by Glab, to call the question.
Voting Aye: Santi, Glab, Murgatroyd, Wimmer, Peterson.
Voting Nay: None.
Absent: Schaefer, Condon.
Motion carried.
Motion by Wimmer, seconded by Murgatroyd, to accept the recommendation of the
Planning and Zoning Commission to direct Staff to prepare an ordinance approving the
Zoning Map Amendment from RS-4, High Density Single-Family Residential to RM-2, High
Density Multi-Family Residential for Mill Street Station
Voting Aye: None.
Voting Nay: Santi, Glab, Murgatroyd, Wimmer, Peterson.
Absent: Schaefer, Condon
Motion denied.
City Attorney Fetzner stated that voting on the Variances and the Preliminary Plat
would be moot following denial of the Zoning Map Amendment.
Alderman Condon returned to Council Chambers at 8:55 p.m.
REQUEST FOR TEMPORARY USE PERMIT FOR SEASONAL LANDSCAPE WASTE
TRANSFER FACILITY - MARENGO DISPOSAL COMPANY
Director Napolitano reiterated that in May 2004 Council granted a Temporary Use
Permit to Marengo Disposal Company to allow a landscape waste transfer facility at the
Meyer Material Gravel Pit, located at 1819 Dot Street.
Director Napolitano noted the temporary facility accommodates a 24-hour temporary
storage of compost material, leaves and yard waste, during the Spring and Fall leaf/yard
waste collections throughout the City of McHenry. He stated the facility assists Marengo
Disposal in operating the City's leaf collection program more efficiently and enables
Marengo Disposal to avoid hauling the compost directly to a permanent facility each time a
truck has a full load.
Director Napolitano informed Council that the temporary use permit was granted for
one year, Fall 2004 through Spring 2005, with the following conditions:
• A copy of the [EPA permit is furnished to the City of McHenry and the site is
inspected by City Staff prior to beginning operations and at the end of operations
each season;
July 6, 2005
Page 10
• The permit will be valid only during the Spring/Fall landscape waste pick-up times in -�-
the City;
• The Applicant must come back to the City for annual renewal of the permit;
• Any expansion of the site must be brought back before the City Council; and
• Only landscape waste generated from the City of McHenry shall be accepted at the
facility.
Director Napolitano stated that Marengo Disposal is requesting Council again
approve use of the site as a landscape waste transfer facility for the Fall 2005 and Spring
2006 seasons.
Motion by Murgatroyd, seconded by Santi, to accept Staffs recommendation to
approve Marengo Disposal Company's request for a Temporary Use Permit for a seasonal
landscape waste transfer facility for the Fall 2005/Spring 2006 season at 1819 North Dot
Street, subject to the following conditions.
• A copy of the IEPA permit is furnished to the City of McHenry and the site is
inspected by City Staff prior to beginning operations and at the end of operations
each season;
• The permit will be valid only during the Spring/Fall landscape waste pick-up times in
the City;
• The Applicant must come back to the City for annual renewal of the permit;
• Any expansion of the site must be brought back before the City Council; and ,
• Only landscape waste generated from the City of McHenry shall be accepted at the
facility.
Voting Aye: Santi, Glab, Murgatroyd, Wimmer, Peterson, Condon.
Voting Nay: None.
Absent: Schaefer.
Motion carried.
REQUEST TO WAIVE BID REQUIREMENTS AND ACCEPT PROPOSAL TO REPLACE
LAVATORIES IN CITY OF MCHENRY JAIL CELLS - SHERMAN,MECHANICAL, INC.
Police Chief O'Meara informed Council that in April 2005 Mr. John Chiurato, of the
Illinois Department of Corrections, performed a Municipal Jail and Lockup Inspection of the
McHenry Municipal Center Police Department. Chief O'Meara indicated that the
inspector's review was favorable; however, a problem was noted regarding the lavatories
in the jail cells. The lavatories were labeled noncompliant due to overall conditions with
--- -- pitting and a broken handicapped toilet. Chief O'Meara stated the lavatories were installed in 1991 when the Municipal Center was constructed.
Additionally, Chief O'Meara indicated the Commission on Accreditation for Law
Enforcement Agencies, Inc. (CALEA) would be performing an on-site inspection of the
Police Department in August of 2005 for accreditation purposes. The jail cell lavatories
must receive a favorable inspection from CALEA to gain accreditation.
Chief O'Meara noted that due to the complexity and type of fixture to be installed
only a limited number of contractors are approved to install the lavatories. Staff received
July 6, 2005
Page 11
two quotes for removal and replacement of the five lavatories in the Police Department jail
cells. Sherman Mechanical provided the lowest quote at $15,762.00. It was noted that
most of the cost for the project is attributable to the proposed Acorn lavatories, which are
made of a high-grade stainless steel combination sink and toilet. Acorn is the only
manufacturer of jail cell lavatories that meets the Illinois Department of Corrections
specifications. Chief O'Meara stated the funding for this item would come out of the
Buildings and Grounds Building Improvements Fund under miscellaneous building
repairstimprovements. The budget for the miscellaneous building improvements account
is $110,000 for the current year.
Responding to Alderman Santi's inquiry, Chief O'Meara indicated he has been
assured by Sherman Mechanical that installation would be completed prior to the CALEA
inspection in August.
Motion by Condon, seconded by Santi, to accept Staffs recommendation to approve
the waiver of bid requirements and approve the proposal from Sherman Mechanical, Inc.,
to replace the lavatories in the jail cells, in an amount not-to-exceed $15,762..
Voting Aye: Santi, Glab, Murgatroyd, Wimmer, Peterson, Condon.
Voting Nay: None.
Absent: Schaefer.
Motion carried.
ALARM PANEL CONNECTIONS
Director Napolitano informed Council that at the November 10, 2004 and February
15, 2005 meetings of the Community Development Committee, members discussed the
current requirements for connection to the City's Police Dispatch 911 Alarm Panel.
Director Napolitano stated that periodically the City receives requests from new
businesses for direct connection to the Alarm Panel. The requests are typically received in
letter form, placed on the Consent Agenda for approval by Council and once approved
connection is permitted.
Director Napolitano noted the current practice of requiring Council approval for the
connections dates back many years to a time when the system in use had a limited number
of spaces available. Due to the limited number of spaces available it was necessary that
Council evaluate which connections to approve in order to not exceed the number
available. Several years ago a new system was implemented. The current system is
virtually limitless in the number of connections available. Therefore, there is no longer a
need to be concerned regarding the number of connections to the panel. The Committee
discussed the pros and cons of continuing the current practice requiring Council approval
of proposed connections.
Director Napolitano noted that initially the Committee members expressed some
concerns about the City's responsibilities to businesses not located in the City of McHenry
limits as the City provides dispatch service for Johnsburg and McCullom Lake. Should a
call be generated by either Johnsburg or McCullom Lake the Police department in that
July 6, 2005
Page 12
community is dispatched. The City of McHenry police may be called upon to assist, but 1
typically the Johnsburg or McCullom Lake police are equipped to handle the call. Director
Napolitano stated the majority of connections to the alarm panel are for businesses in the
City of McHenry. According to police dispatch logs, most police calls are generated from
businesses in the City.
The Committee recommended that alarm panel connections requested by
businesses in the City of McHenry be allowed without sending the matter before Council.
Connections requested by businesses outside the McHenry corporate limits would
continue to be presented to Council for approval on the Consent Agenda.
Motion by Wimmer, seconded by Peterson, to accept the Community Development
Committee recommendation, to approve alarm panel connections requested by businesses
within McHenry city limits without presentation to City Council; and that alarm panel
connections requested by businesses outside the McHenry corporate limits be presented
to Council for approval on the Consent Agenda.
Voting Aye: Santi, Glab, Murgatroyd, Wimmer, Peterson, Condon.
Voting Nay: None.
Absent: Schaefer.
Motion carried.
MAYOR—STATEMENT AND REPORT
Mayor Low thanked the McHenry Jaycees for the 4ch of July fireworks display on
Saturday, July 2, 2005 held at Petersen Park. She stated the event was well attended.
Mayor Low announced that the McHenry County Council of Governments would be
holding a meeting on July 27, 2005 at the Concorde Banquet facility in Kildeer. She noted
it is a good opportunity to socialize with the officials of surrounding communities and stated
anyone interested in attending should contact Marci Geraghty.
COMMITTEE REPORTS
Alderman Wimmer, Chairman of the Transportation Committee, announced a
meeting of the Transportation Committee is scheduled on July 20, 2005 at 6:30 p.m. in the
Aldermen's Conference Room.
Alderman Wimmer, Chairman of the Public Works Committee, announced he would
like to schedule a meeting of the Public Works Committee on August 1, 2005 at 6:30 p.m.,
prior to the regular City Council meeting. He indicated that should this date not be
convenient for those individuals on the Committee they should contact Director of Public
Works Marcinko.
STAFF REPORTS —
Director of Public Works Marcinko announced a partial collapse of the sewer main
on Main Street. He indicated that repairs being made prior to the overlay caused the line
to collapse and estimated the cost of repairs at approximately $30,000. Director Marcinko
stated that repairs would have no impact on Fiesta Days festivities. Director Marcinko
July 6, 2005
Page 13
assured Council that he would provide additional information as it became available.
FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Alderman Glab elaborated further on the Mill Street Station development project.
Motion by Glab stating Council not consider any application for a zoning change
that may be brought before Council regarding Mill Street Station, 801 Mill Street, for multi-
family housing, until such time as a future Council rescinds such order.
City Administrator Maxeiner suggested the development of the property be
addressed in the proposed Comprehensive Plan.
Director Napolitano stated the subject would be addressed at the Planning and
Zoning Commission meeting scheduled on Thursday, July 21, 2005.
Alderman Glab withdrew his motion.
Alderman Glab asked Staff to provide an update regarding the ongoing issues Mr.
Archaki has with the Lincoln Hills Subdivision and Gerstad Construction.
Motion by Wimmer, seconded by Glab, to revisit the discussion regarding
subdivisions with Home Owner Associations and the Community Development
Department's ability to issue permits at a future meeting of the Community Development
Committee.
Voting Aye: Santi, Glab, Murgatroyd, Wimmer, Peterson, Condon.
Voting Nay: None.
Absent: Schaefer.
Motion carried.
ADJOURNMENT
Motion by Wimmer, seconded by Santi, to adjourn the meeting at 9:14 p.m.
Voting Aye: Santi, Glab, Murgatroyd, Wimmer, Peterson, Condon.
Voting Nay: None.
Absent: Schaefer.
Motion carried.
The Meeting was adjourned at 9:14 p.m.
J
MAYOR ITY CLERK