Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - 01/05/2000 - Committee of the Whole COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING JANUARY 5, 2000 A Committee of the Whole Meeting of the McHenry City Council was called to order by Mayor Cuda at 8:20 P.M. on Wednesday, January 5, 2000 in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Center. At roll call the following Aldermen were present: Bolger, Glab, McClatchey, Murgatroyd, Baird. Absent: None. City Staff in attendance were: City Administrator Lobaito, City Clerk Althoff, City Attorney McArdle, Chief of Police Kostecki, Director of Public Works Batt, Director of Parks and Recreation Merkel, Director of Community Development Napolitano, Assistant Administrator Maxeiner; Athletic Supervisor Michael Perkins; Recreation Supervisor Cynthia Jerden. Absent: None. Mayor Cuda stated the purpose of this evening's Committee of the Whole Meeting is to consider and discuss the possibility of presenting a referendum question on the funding of a community recreational center to the voters of McHenry, as well as, to consider and evaluate funding mechanisms. Staff explained, if Council elects to place the recreational center referendum question on the March primary ballot, formal action is required prior to January 18, 2000. Council has been considering the plausibility of constructing and operating a recreational facility for several years. A site located on the west side of the existing municipal building property has been selected. An architectural firm, Sente and Rubel, was selected to prepare preliminary plans for the recreational facility. These plans were presented to Council in Spring 1999, and feature a two-story facility of approximately 62,577 square feet. Staff, as per Council direction, has analyzed and developed both construction and operational costs. Architectural consultant Sente and Rubel estimate construction costs totaling $9.17 million. Building construction is estimated at $6.47 million while site work and contingencies add approximately $2.7 million. These estimates do not include any type of water facilities. Conservative estimates for the first year's operating budget are $722,600. Personnel costs are estimated at -- approximately $336,000 and incorporate one full time fitness center manager, fitness center aides, attendants, and one full time custodial position. Future program revenues were based on current City information. In total, program revenues are estimated to increase by approximately $75,000. Assistant Administrator Maxeiner estimates the City of McHenry's operating budget would require at a maximum an additional $345,000 in revenue annually. Council has unanimously expressed reluctance to raise property taxes to fund a recreational facility. Staff therefore is suggesting the initiation of a 5% telecommunications tax. Municipalities are allowed to institute a tax of up to 5% on the gross receipts for all telecommunication companies operating within the municipality. Currently the City of McHenry has implemented the Telecommunications Infrastructure Maintenance Fee Act assessing a 1 % tax on gross receipts collected on all local and long distance telephone services. This fee is generating approximately $170,000 annually. Utilizing these figures, Staff is estimating the creation of a 5% tax on telecommunication companies which would generate approximately $850,000 annually. City Administrator Lobaito stated as per Council direction, Staff attempted unsuccessfully to locate a consultant to assist the City in developing and promoting a recreational center referendum proposal. Elementary School District 15 representative, when contacted by Staff members to obtain a consultant referral, obtained a recommendation not to hire a consultant. Council also opined if a referendum question were to be placed on the March ballot, public input must be sought. City Administrator Lobaito suggested Council consider placing an advisory referendum question regarding the creation of a 5% telecommunications tax with proceeds earmarked for the construction and operation of a recreational facility on the March ballot. City Administrator Lobaito noted architectural consultants Sente and Rubel have provided substantiating information supporting their contention the entire recreational facility process from concept plan to groundbreaking will take approximately one year. Community input could be obtained during this period of time. Page 2 Comm of Whole 1/5/00 Alderman Bolger, noting the significant cost, opined the City was not ready to proceed with the construction of a recreational facility. In response to Alderman Bolger's inquiry, Staff noted the Cunat Brothers offer to construct a recreational facility on their property might yet be a viable option for Council consideration. Alderman McClatchey opined the community supported the development of a recreational facility. He suggested Council move forward. Alderman Baird also supported the development of a recreational facility. However, he did not support placing the development and/or funding of a recreational facility as an advisory referendum question on the March ballot. Alderman Baird also stated his support of initiating a telecommunications tax as a recreational facility funding option. Assistant Administrator Maxeiner noted the need to estimate future revenues in order to determine any potential deficit. He noted program revenues are estimated to increase by approximately $75,000 and fitness center memberships are expected to produce a minimum revenue of $303,500. It is assumed, therefore, the City's operating budget would require an additional $345,000 in annual revenues. Some discussion followed regarding the proposed custodial staff and recreational center maintenance requirements. In response to Alderman Glab's inquiry, Staff noted the $2/square foot maintenance and repair line item cited in Table 2 by architectural consultants Sente and Rubel does not include basic building maintenance. It refers more specifically to equipment service maintenance. City Administrator Lobaito stated both the operational -1 costs as well as the anticipated revenues are conservative estimates. Alderman Bolger suggested any recreational facility proposal include facilities and space for the performing arts. Some discussion followed regarding funding options. Alderman Murgatroyd reminded Council of the numerous and varied capital projects requiring consideration, prioritization, and funding. City Administrator noted Council should determine whether a telecommunications tax is to be created and, if created, should all revenues be earmarked for the development and construction of a recreational center. Alderman Murgatroyd suggested Council also consider establishing a sunset clause for the telecommunications tax once the recreational facility was self- sufficient. It was the consensus of Council to state their intent to discontinue the telecommunications tax once the recreational facility was self-sufficient; however, Council also stated their reluctance to bind future Councils by this action. Mayor Cuda also noted financial consultant Harold Warren informed Staff the City is obligated to abate pledged taxes if the appropriate revenue source satisfies the need for monies otherwise secured by the pledged taxes. He did however note the 1993 Water Sewer Alternate Revenue General Obligation Bonds will be retired in _ 2004, and the 1990 General Obligation Bonds will be retired in 2006, freeing up additional monies. City Administrator Lobaito also noted several area residents have expressed interest in donating sizeable monies for the construction of a recreational facility. Some discussion followed. It was the consensus of Council to proceed with the creation of a 5% telecommunications tax earmarking revenues for the development and construction of a recreational facility. Council also chose not to pursue a recreational facility advisory referendum question on the March ballot. Mayor opened the floor to audience comment. Page 3 Comm of Whole 1/5/00 McHenry resident Bob Diedrich of 3904 Prestwick Street addressed Council. Mr. Diedrich expressed trepidation with the proposed creation of an $8.8 million recreational facility. Although he opined a recreational facility is necessary, he expressed opposition to an increase in both property taxes and the creation of a telecommunications tax. He suggested Council consider contacting private self- supporting fitness entities such as Life-Time Fitness Centers or Bally's. He also suggested health care entities such as Centegra Health Systems or a YMCA might be an acceptable solution. Mayor Cuda responded noting in order to attract private fitness entities, the City must consider providing the desired demographics, meaning approving additional single family residential construction. Council has previously expressed their reluctance to approve high-density development. Some discussion followed regarding the impact of a 5% telecommunications tax on local businesses. Council directed Staff to contact financial consultant Harold Warren and proceed with the creation of a 5% telecommunications tax for the City of McHenry. Once developed, this information should be presented to Council for further consideration and formal action. ADJOURNMENT Motion by McClatchey, seconded by Glab, to adjourn the meeting at 9:48 p.m. Voting Aye: Bolger, Glab, McClatchey, Murgatroyd, Baird. Voting Nay: None. Absent: None. Motion carried. The meeting was adjourned at 9:48 p.m. R CITY IERK